Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 U.S.C. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U.S.C. The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on October 11, 2005. The judgment of the court of appeals was entered on July 13, 2005. 22-44) and the decision of the administrative law judge (Pet. The decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board (Pet. The opinion of the court of appeals (Pet.

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. Whether the Board reasonably concluded that petitioner unlawfully maintained a 'Confidential Infor mation' rule that specifically defined confidential infor mation to include wages and other terms and conditions of employment, and warned that breach of the non disclosure policy would lead to discipline. Whether the National Labor Relations Board reasonably concluded that petitioner committed unfair labor practices by disciplining employees for violating an unlawful work rule that prohibited employee dis cussion of petitioner's tips-splitting policy anywhere on its property.Ģ. BURDICK >Attorney National Labor Relations Board Washington, D.C. DREEBEN Assistant General Counsel RUTH E. FERGUSON Associate General Counsel LINDA J. CLEMENT Solicitor General Counsel of Record Department of Justice Washington, D.C. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUITīRIEF FOR THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD IN OPPOSITION In the Supreme Court of the United States

Double eagle hotel casino